Ok. Quite the controversy was caused by this week’s pronouncement by TechCrunch that Cambrian House is deadpooled (additional coverage here and here). It’s not obvious what’s going on right now… though recently it was brought to my attention that even though the post is over three days old, there continues to be a steady stream of comments added every day. Sure enough, you can find plenty of opinions on why the current model failed. And yes, most of them are anonymously posted. Screw it, I’m going to ball up and give my opinions.
I worked at Cambrian House for about 8 months as a contractor. I’m not going to be talking about proprietary information, nor providing slanderous fodder, nor giving away any precious intellectual property information (whatever the hell that is…?) — rather I’m going to stick to generalizations that anybody with any sort of connection to the company could have also concluded. I keep getting pinged by former employees, current employees, old community members, and investors, and I’m seriously sick of pretending that Denmark smells nice. This is the one and only time I’m going to talk about this stuff.
What follows is a review of what they did right, what they did wrong, and a recipe for chocolate chip cookies.
What Cambrian House Did Right
- Stimulating work environment - it always had the feeling that you could be working on something revolutionary and you were doing it with some of the most creative and intelligent people possible
- Professional Trust - no one questioned your work, while you were doing it. They trusted people like adults to finish the work.
- Fierce Debate - once work was finished, it was open to public debate by almost the entire company. This really made everyone feel like they had a voice.
- Transparency with the community - weekly meetings were broadcast across the internet.
- Not playing smallball - trying to spark a mass movement across the world makes everyone feel like they’re part of a mission
- Making noise - you can say a lot of things about CH, but we certainly made a lot of noise wherever we went on the marketing front
- Anything is possible - set a lofty goal, and try to reach it. Traffic, business development, partnerships, whatever. You’d be amazed what you can do when you think big. For a few months, CH was magic, in every sense.
What Cambrian House Did Wrong
- Not having a simple, compelling product plan from Day One - what is the one hook that keeps people coming back?
- Never finding product-market fit - spending too much time guessing what the world changing product is rather than actually understanding what the market wants or demands.
- Changing ’strategies’ too much - this confused the community who joined under a certain product expectation
- Raising too much money - this forced CH into a 9 figure exit expectation right off the bat. Instead of living frugally and scraping by with nothing, CH started with a massive bankroll.
- Hiring too many people - the mythical man month? For some products still awaiting release, it’s the mythical man year.
- Over-reliance on marketing and gimmicks - after awhile, the fun conference displays, swag giveaways, and community-owned messages wear really thin. What people actually want is a product that keeps them coming back again and again.
- A Gossip Culture - It’s hard to trust the mission if certain people don’t trust each other.
- Acting like a large corporation - having the corporate inertia of a company ten times our size didn’t exactly pan out well for communication across all levels … two guys working in a garage don’t really have that problem.
- The belief that you’re one mainstream press article, viral video, or linkbaited blog post away from making it big - sure, these things are all important, but what’s the point of attracting traffic if people weren’t entirely sure what they were supposed to do when they got there? Build the compelling product first, and promote yourself, second.
- Being “built to flip” and advertising ourselves as such - I can’t think of one way to turn off potential acquirers better than to suggest your company is not interested in creating long-term value.
- Following other people’s advice too easily - one suggestion from a community member or ‘person-in-our-world’ could take us off on a variety of tangents that almost always took our eye off the ball.
- Extraneous side projects - too much time and money were blown on cute projects that were greenlighted by nobody and eventually went nowhere. If you’re not working on the main product, you’ve got to ask yourself: what are you doing this for?
I’ve got great admiration for some of the people that work at Cambrian House, and I’m really excited to hear about their new direction. I think the TechCrunch article was a little heavy-handed, but probably not entirely off-base. The truth always lies somewhere in the middle with sensational headlines. I enjoyed my time working there, and I learned a lot while cutting my teeth in the startup world. And yeah, I still want us all to win in the end. Good luck.
A Recipe for Chocolate Chip Cookies
Ingredients
- 1 cup butter, softened
- 1 cup white sugar
- 1 cup packed brown sugar
- 2 eggs
- 2 teaspoons vanilla extract
- 3 cups all-purpose flour
- 1 teaspoon baking soda
- 2 teaspoons hot water
- 1/2 teaspoon salt
- 2 cups semisweet chocolate chips
- 1 cup chopped walnuts
Directions
- Preheat oven to 350 degrees F (175 degrees C).
- Cream together the butter, white sugar, and brown sugar until smooth. Beat in the eggs one at a time, then stir in the vanilla. Dissolve baking soda in hot water. Add to batter along with salt. Stir in flour, chocolate chips, and nuts. Drop by large spoonfuls onto ungreased pans.
- Bake for about 10 minutes in the preheated oven, or until edges are nicely browned.



May 16th, 2008 at 11:08 am
Professional environment? Man, I can’t even count the number of times I heard a boss yelling at someone through the stairway door. As for gossip culture — hard not to with some of the bizarre things that happened there. How many pregnancies were there? How many belonged to he who does not comb?
As for the rest, though, you’re pretty much dead on. Marketing and other shiny things were a constant disruption from finishing a number of decent products. There were several in dev. at one time or another that could’ve turned into solid earners.
May 16th, 2008 at 12:08 pm
I’d agree with the “former ch’er” on this one. I don’t think professional environment counts. Lets see…throwing eggs around, tossing junk on the floor and saying it was “for the rats”, dry humping anyone who walked in the door, sexual harassments galore, the list goes on. If you removed MJ you MIGHT have a professional environment. Then again it’s not like you could blame MJ for everything. I blame the gin, and at the same time thank the gin for getting us through it all. Good post though Parkatti, I think the rest of the article was on the money.
May 16th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
To be fair, I didn’t say ‘professional environment’. I would consider the lack of a professional environment to be at times both a strength and a weakness of CH.
What I said was professional trust. Meaning, you had an opportunity to be creative and try things out… at least initially.
May 16th, 2008 at 12:37 pm
I’m not sure there was a “ball” for the eyes to be taken off of. And I totally agree with your assertion that building a compelling product should be the first and foremost goal. To this day, I’m still not sure what the business concept of CH was after the initial model failed.
CH did have a community of people who really wanted to help it be successful (remember the Longship Council?) but had difficulty listening to outside opinions, or at least acting on them, despite a marketing message of “trusting the crowd”.
I’ve never seen another company were non-employees would self-organize with no pay whatsoever and spend hours of time and energy simply for the success of the company. And yet, what came of it? There were documents, email lists, phone conferences…all for naught.
May 16th, 2008 at 1:59 pm
Ummm… I take exception to “former ch’er” saying
How many pregnancies were there? How many
belonged to he who does not comb?
I’m the guy who never combs, and I’m progeny-free for over 40 years!
May 16th, 2008 at 2:07 pm
As to the rest of the commentary, I have to say I agree with Parker for the most part. When people ask me about my time at CH, my standard answer is that it was kinda like being one of a bunch of kids playing “grown-ups”. OTOH, I have no regrets, and wouldn’t trade it… I had a great time, and worked with some great people.
May 19th, 2008 at 12:08 pm
Parker,
I really appreciated reading this. Really stoked about what’s happening with you right now as well.
Keep on truckin’
Blue
May 20th, 2008 at 9:51 am
Eh… To be honest, I still see some value in the business model. Working at Cambrian House tainted me from ever working in a ‘normal’ environment, and made me realize my own dreams that much more. Like cyberdong, I had a great time.
If I had to do it again, I would. If I had a chance to go back, I would. Despite all the bad that went on there, I feel it was far overshadowed by the good.
But, that’s just me.
/2c
May 21st, 2008 at 8:49 am
[...] The VenCorps machine has been ramping up lately and it got a further injection of excitement with some posts in the last week. [...]