::

July 23, 2008  |  Michael Parkatti |  

These people look serious...Take a look at these people on the left.  I’m not sure who they are, but they look incredibly serious.  Seriously, take a look at each one of them.

Do you notice anything special about them?

I know, it’s a tough one.  As it turns out, there is something special about them — they’re normal people, doing normal things.

How about an incredibly overbearing statement?  There are very few companies that reach IPO or sell for over $100 Million that haven’t had people like this using and/or buying their products.  I know we can all think of some special cases (Bebo, Club Penguin, maybe Digg?), but on the whole, you need a person who has no heightened exposure to technology and does not belong to a special demographic to both understand and need your product.

Who is this ‘normal’ person you speak of?

Let’s talk about these peeps up there some more.  Think about their day, think about the things that they do, and then think about how your product can trickle into their happy-spheres.

What makes them normal?

  • they work 9 - 5 jobs, most likely in an office setting
  • they have a computer that their work gave them which is most likely restricted to outside software
  • they may have a desktop computer at home that they use to watch YouTube or surf their Facebook profile for a few minutes every night
  • they know and like Windows, no matter what the cool Apple ads say (and on the whole, they’re wrong)
  • their favourite software applications are Outlook, Excel, Word, and PowerPoint.  Happily enough, this is known as Microsoft Office.  They think these are great pieces of software (and on the whole, they’re right).
  • they can’t fathom how internet startups make money (and on the whole, they’re right)
  • they don’t post photos online, or share links, or make podcasts, or aggregate content, or contribute to the Linux kernel.  In fact, there is a 98% they’ve never even heard of ‘Web 2.0′.
  • they probably sign up to 0-3 different new websites a year, probably after a discussion with a colleague they trust.  These are probably perceived as ways to help their careers somehow (hello LinkedIn) or as part of a wave of late adoption (hello Facebook).
  • they don’t own an iPhone.  They abhor Macs.
  • to perform any new task in any piece of software is a massive threshold of new ability.  They are likely to use less than 5% of any of the features of a piece of software they actually do use.
  • they don’t read TechCrunch.
  • they’ve been visiting the same websites everyday since 1997 (CNN.com, nytimes.com)
  • the highlight of their week isn’t the gluttony of iPhone blog coverage — it’s probably Friday night when their friends are hosting a dinner party or Sunday when the Bills play football.
  • they believe that a wild horde of malcontented hackers are watching their every move in unchartered internet waters.  This is most conspicuously manifested in their distrust of giving their credit card information over a webform.
  • they don’t experience signal vs noise problems.  It’s hard to have noise problems when you only have a handful of signals.
  • they don’t disdainfully complain about having 500 emails a day to contend with.  They probably have on average 5-15 emails a day that require their personal response.
  • oh yeah, and they don’t have a problem with paying for things that offer a tangible value.

As the consumer internet frenzy reaches a nadir, I think we can safely assume that more and more startups are going to start rediscovering and embracing these people.  Their survival may very well depend on it.

But as purveyors of software, it is our duty to include these people in our designs.  We need to make their lives better, as much as we need to make our software better.

Think about these people.  Think about what they want, and why they want it.  Think about how they could incorporate your software into their everyday lives without a drastic learning curve.  Try to picture why they would bring up your product to their friends over dinner.  Try to put yourself in their shoes while designing, and do not give your vicarious-self an opportunity to mess up.  Give them a strict narrative, and an easily digestible identity.

I love it when tech-oriented consumer apps say that their target audience is ‘everyone!!!!!’.  No, actually, your target audience is the 1% of the population who could even begin to perceive what you’re doing to be useful.  And you’re fighting against 1000 other startups for their attention.

Talk about blue oceans — think about the other 99% who are sitting in their normal bubbles and have free time to encroach upon.  They also need life improving services.  Think about trying to cater to a wider iaudience, and It’ll feel like trudging into a huge patch of fresh, unbroken snow.  (For those who don’t know what it feels like to trudge into fresh snow — trust me, it’s pretty sweet).

I would posit that the frontiers of technology will not be forged amongst the 1% of uber-adopters; rather, they will be proven out when the unwashed masses can also derive some utility.  Many do evolve from catering to the 1% to eventually becoming useful by everyone… but most do not.

So think about these ‘normal’ people.  They could very well make or break your product.

14 Responses to “The Tale of a ‘Normal’ Person: A Reality Check”

  1. Einar Vollset Says:

    Amen.

  2. Rob Says:

    “they know and like Windows, no matter what the cool Apple ads say (and on the whole, they’re wrong)

    they don’t own an iPhone. They abhor Macs.

    the highlight of their week isn’t the gluttony of iPhone blog coverage”

    So this is an anti-Apple post.

  3. Michael Parkatti Says:

    No, not anti-Apple — hell I like a lot of apple products, and will buy an iPhone if I can ever spare the cash!

    I’m not describing me here, this is a user profile. A certain demographic certainly are ambivalent to the hype. I’m talking about getting into their heads and thinking about what they want.

  4. Richard Says:

    The problem with these “normal” people you describe is that they don’t spend their extra time on the computer, and don’t think of using their computer for “fun” (Youtube, Facebook) until at least half of their friends are doing it first. So, it doesn’t make much sense of going for them first. You’ll need to make a site/product that excites the early adopters first, then let them blow it up.
    Take Youtube as an example. If they targeted these “normal” people first there would be nothing for them to see because the “normal” people aren’t going to upload videos, much less figure out how to create/copy the content to put up on Youtube.
    You may go for the “normal” people eventually, but you’re going to need to get the more tech-savvy early adopters excited to get something off the ground. If you’re talking about software, anyway.

  5. Ryan Says:

    If I’m making a new high-tech product, I’d rather target the 1% who are likely to buy a new high-tech product than the 99% who are not likely to buy one. There’s a reason why no other companies are competing for their attention. It’s not a “blue ocean”. It’s a dessert.

  6. a Says:

    The average white collar worker probably thinks Apple is just another computer manufacturer, like Dell or Gateway, without any significant software difference. Considering that MS produces Office for both platforms, and that both platforms have web browsers, this is right as far as their likely usage goes anyway. So I don’t buy this abhorring Macs business. Obviously the IT department that buys computers for the workers is going to realize that supporting two platforms is a PITA, though.

  7. Jason Kolb Says:

    Bravo! Excellent reality check, and I don’t disagree with a word of it. It really highlights the “bubbleness” of the current startup scene.

  8. Michael Parkatti Says:

    @Ryan — you’re totally right, this only makes sense for consumer facing software products. If I’m looking to commercialize a nuclear fusion reactor, I’m probably not buying Google Adwords.

    @Jason, thanks!

  9. ken Says:

    I obviously need to get into some sort of online business for people in suits. I think briefcase-stereotype.com is still free.

  10. Alex Says:

    @Ryan — I guess in your metaphor, the 1% are the chocolate icing on the 99% dessert?

  11. Luke Cole Says:

    How true.

  12. ken Says:

    I think macs are for wierd people with long hair

  13. JofArnold Says:

    Very true. If I see another crappy startup who thinks that the whole world suffers from information overload, I’m going to go crazy! In fact, it annoys me so much that I think I’m going to start a blog about it.

    Having a user base equal to the combined twitter feeds of Scoble, LeMeur and Arrington rarely means you have a successful business.

  14. Bill Moore Says:

    Having worked at Apple for almost 10 years in Cupertino from the mid 80’s to mid 90’s, I have to agree with this post. Most startups design for themselves and most startups are made up of 20-something geeks who spend the majority of their time on their computers. They use twitter as a verb and have a dedicated bittorrent machine pulling down movies and music. However, I also tend to agree with several of the comments that the 1% are the catalyst for getting things started so the 99%, eventually, get interested in using a software package or web service.

    So, the lesson seems to be: Design for the 1% (coolness factor, ease of use, social features) initially, but make sure there’s a set of features when first signing up that make the site useful enough to the 99% that they’ll want to come back. Tricky balance, hard to hit, and that’s why most startups fail: They can’t find that balance.

Leave a Comment